Bug #99197 for Inline-Java: "Inline::Java" is missing in CPAN's index

Sun Sep 28 15:39:21 2014 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

"Inline::Java" is missing in CPAN's index

A session in the CPAN.pm shell: Show quoted text

cpan> m Inline::Java

No objects of type Module found for argument Inline::Java Show quoted text

cpan> d /Inline.*Java/

Fetching with LWP: http://cpan.cpantesters.org/authors/id/P/PA/PATL/CHECKSUMS Distribution id = P/PA/PATL/Inline-Java-0.53.tar.gz CPAN_USERID PATL (Patrick LeBoutillier <patl@cpan.org>) CONTAINSMODS Inline::Java::Array Inline::Java::Array::Normalizer Inline::Java::Array::Tie Inline::Java::Callback Inline::Java::Class Inline::Java::Class::Coerce Inline::Java::Handle Inline::Java::Handle::Tie Inline::Java::JNI Inline::Java::JVM Inline::Java::Object Inline::Java::Object::Private Inline::Java::Object::StaticMember Inline::Java::Object::Tie Inline::Java::PerlInterpreter Inline::Java::PerlNatives Inline::Java::Portable Inline::Java::Protocol Inline::Java::Server UPLOAD_DATE 2011-01-09 It seems that Inline::Java was deleted somehow from the CPAN index...

Sat Nov 29 03:47:26 2014 ETJ [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Thanks for the report - this is showing up fine: https://metacpan.org/pod/Inline::Java Closing.

Sat Nov 29 03:47:26 2014 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Sat Nov 29 03:47:27 2014 ETJ [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Sat Nov 29 03:47:27 2014 ETJ [...] cpan.org - Taken

Sat Nov 29 03:58:31 2014 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On 2014-11-29 03:47:26, ETJ wrote: Show quoted text

> Thanks for the report - this is showing up fine: > https://metacpan.org/pod/Inline::Java > > Closing.

Confirmed. Probably the new Inline-Java releases fixed this problem.

Sat Jan 10 08:48:19 2015 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On 2014-11-29 03:58:31, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text

> On 2014-11-29 03:47:26, ETJ wrote:

> > Thanks for the report - this is showing up fine: > > https://metacpan.org/pod/Inline::Java > > > > Closing.

> > Confirmed. Probably the new Inline-Java releases fixed this problem.

I have to reopen this issue --- currently again 0.53 seems to be indexed (check the metacpan link again), and not the current Inline-Java-0.58.

Sat Jan 10 08:48:25 2015 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'resolved' to 'open'

Fri Feb 06 15:10:21 2015 raherh [...] gmail.com - Correspondence added

From:

raherh [...] gmail.com

On Sat Jan 10 08:48:19 2015, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text

> I have to reopen this issue --- currently again 0.53 seems to be > indexed (check the metacpan link again), and not the current Inline- > Java-0.58.

Don't you know which version is up to date? In cpan I can see 0.53 by PATL and in cpan archive 0.58 by ETJ. I just started to use the module (0.58) and experience some quirky behaviour. Radek

Fri Aug 12 07:53:04 2016 PLICEASE [...] cpan.org - Cc PLICEASE added

Mon Dec 19 13:16:00 2016 MPERRY [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

The version numbers are different in the distribution's modules. Java.pm has a version of 0.58 while the other files have versions of 0.53_90 and 0.52. Shouldn't they all have the same version number?

Mon Dec 19 13:26:19 2016 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On 2016-12-19 13:16:00, MPERRY wrote: Show quoted text

> The version numbers are different in the distribution's modules. > Java.pm has a version of 0.58 while the other files have versions of > 0.53_90 and 0.52. Shouldn't they all have the same version number?

No. There's a consistent_versions policy in cpants, but people disagree with this policy (see https://github.com/cpants/www-cpants/issues/73 for an example, and me also disagrees).

Wed Jan 03 02:22:22 2018 ZHENYZ [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

How can this thing be solved? I am looking for a patch for https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=82645 , and it seems that http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/ETJ/Inline-Java-0.58/CHANGES could contain the patch. But the 0.58 version is still not indexed by CPAN ? On Mon Dec 19 13:26:19 2016, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text

> On 2016-12-19 13:16:00, MPERRY wrote:

> > The version numbers are different in the distribution's modules. > > Java.pm has a version of 0.58 while the other files have versions of > > 0.53_90 and 0.52. Shouldn't they all have the same version number?

> > No. There's a consistent_versions policy in cpants, but people > disagree with this policy (see https://github.com/cpants/www- > cpants/issues/73 for an example, and me also disagrees).

Mon Jan 29 03:08:41 2018 ETJ [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Since 0.59 is showing on MetaCPAN, I will close this ticket.

Mon Jan 29 03:08:42 2018 ETJ [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'