On Sat Sep 20 18:15:05 2014, DOLMEN wrote:
Show quoted text> Le 2014-09-20 07:20:35, NERDVANA a écrit :
> > Marking resolved, unless you have anything to add.
>
> The problem is that version numbers for package have different issues
> in some
> parts of the Perl environment:
>
http://www.dagolden.com/index.php/369/version-numbers-should-be-
> boring/
>
> I don't think it is safe to publish 0.002000 after 0.002000_01, as
> some tools
> may be confused. For example, rt.cpan.org is confused as it orders the
> releases
> in ASCII order in the "Fixed in" list, so 0.002000 is before
> 0.002000_00 and
> 0.002000_01.
>
> At least as a human I am confused by this.
> That's why a clear 'Changes' file that mention the intermediate
> development
> releases would clarify this.
> Another way would be to completely skip 0.002000 once you used this
> for a _01
> dev release. That's how ExtUtils::MakeMaker does: 6.96, 6.97_01,
> 6.97_02, 6.98.
> That would ensure that both tools and humans are not confused.
>
> --
> Olivier Mengué -
http://perlresume.org/DOLMEN -
>
https://gratipay.com/dolmen/
I have deleted the offending test-releases, since they weren't really intended for the public anyway.
Also, the module has a new unambiguous version now.