Subject: | Worth mentioning Moo and Class::Tiny? |
Date: | Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:14:56 +0000 |
To: | bugs-Object-Simple [...] rt.cpan.org |
From: | Matt S Trout <mst [...] shadowcat.co.uk> |
I can definitely see Object::Simple counting as "mojo-style thing in between
Moo and nothing at all", but calling it a cut down version of Moose is ...
missing just how many features Moose has ;)
It's also worth mentioning Class::Tiny for M* style OO as small as possible.
(I'm really glad Object::Simple exists, I just think people should see all
the possible choices :)
--
Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue
http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/
Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN
commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.