Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the PDF-API2 CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 98572
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: PDF-API2

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: philperry [...] hvc.rr.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: various cleanup on Content.pm
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:53:38 -0400
To: bug-PDF-API2 [...] rt.cpan.org
From: <philperry [...] hvc.rr.com>
PDF:API2 v2.022 Perl 5.16.3 Windows 7 Severity: Normal * General cleanup of code, adding spaces to improve readability and () on function arguments * In code, regularize argument lists with consistent naming * Rearrange order of POD for more logical layout (grouping of functions and their POD descriptions) * Enhance POD with fuller descriptions * Add methods not described in POD: text_justified() and 4 text_fill_*() * Rename private function arctocurve() to _arctocurve() * Argument to render() clamp to 0..7 range There are a number of other internal or private functions that perhaps should also be renamed to start with an underscore _. Is anyone using them? They shouldn't be! I have submitted a modified Content.pm with these changes to the maintainer.
This was too much to review (largely a rewrite of over 2,000 lines of code), so I'm rejecting this. If you can resubmit the POD updates (not the rearranging, but the improved documentation in-place), that would be handy.
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #98572]
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:43:34 -0500
To: bug-PDF-API2 [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Phil M Perry <philperry [...] hvc.rr.com>
Show quoted text
> If you can resubmit the POD updates (not the rearranging, but the
improved documentation in-place), that would be handy. OK, I'll try to get to it once all the other hits to Content are attended to. I just want to emphasize that it's really important to rearrange the order of entries to make it logically grouped and easy to find something. The current jumble of methods (reflected in the POD) is really haphazard and makes it hard to understand what does what and find information. Would you accept the following? 1. code updates and POD fixes for logged bugs on RT (as separate fixes) 2. code cleanup and POD cleanup (as a number of separate submissions under this bug report) 3. code and POD rearrange into logical order (as the final submission under this bug report) I could break up #3 into smaller pieces (e.g., moving one method at a time) if that would be acceptable.