On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Dave Rolsky via RT wrote:
Show quoted text> On Tue Sep 02 09:47:05 2014, ppisar wrote:
> > Why did DateTime-1.12 increase DateTime-TimeZone minimal version to
> > 1.74? I cannot see the reason. The tests modified with
> >
> > commit 00fed1e2e376e8aa086e4841c3dc5ef6193e65d3
> > Author: Dave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
> > Date: Sun Aug 31 10:55:20 2014 -0500
> >
> > Fixes for latest DT::TZ
> >
> > does not use any new interface not available before 1.74.
>
> Because the tests were breaking with earlier versions of DT::TZ.
>
Indeed? I though the breakage for the fixed by the commit, so there is not
need to change the version requirement.
I tested the patched tests against DateTime-TimeZone-1.73 and even
DateTime-TimeZone-1.63 successfully.
Show quoted text> Given that DT::TZ is backwards compatible (beyond zone name changes) I don't
> see what the problem is.
Not entirely. E.g. DT-TZ-1.71 started to require List::AllUtils.
-- Petr