Hi,
I think everyone here has overlooked the last two releases and that has caused confusion.
The patch is not needed. The issue is fixed since 0.03.
In general I have no objections against more co-maintainers and I accept all decisions from Florian. But I do not see any need for yet another maintainer.
To fix the threads.t test, I follow Harlan’s suggestion and release another version without this test.
--
Boris Zentner
Show quoted text> Am 30.04.2015 um 23:22 schrieb Florian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org>:
>
> I had given Boris (on Cc, hi Boris!) co-maint a while back so he could release some of his changes, which he did.
>
> Boris, do you think getting these fixes released is something you could help with? Would you mind more co-maintainers being added? I certainly have no objections to that as the original author.
>
>
>
> On April 30, 2015 5:11:21 PM EDT, Matt S Trout <mst@shadowcat.co.uk> wrote:
> DAMNIT I CC'ED rafl@ YET AGAIN
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Matt S Trout <mst@shadowcat.co.uk> -----
>
> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:00:28 +0000
> From: Matt S Trout <mst@shadowcat.co.uk>
> To: David Golden <xdg@xdg.me>
> Cc: Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@setec.io>,
> bug-nanomsg-raw@rt.cpan.org, bzm@2bz.de,
> "modules@perl.org" <modules@perl.org>, rafl@cpan.org
> Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #98340] Release
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 04:47:25PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> FLORA is primary maint, now, so shouldn't this go through him?
>
> Huh, I wasn't aware there was already an attempted adoption - there doesn't
> seem to've been a release yet.
>
> rafl, whaddya want us to do?
>
> --
> Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.