Bug #97815 for Mozilla-CA: Specify license in META

Thu Aug 07 03:36:38 2014 REHSACK [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

Specify license in META

https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#license allows being concrete. Suitable seems to be license => [ qw(mozilla_1_1 gpl_2 lgpl_2_1) ] Thanks, Jens

Mon Aug 29 11:01:41 2016 dolmen [...] cpan.org - Requestor DOLMEN added

Mon Feb 26 08:17:56 2018 skaji [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Currently "Invalid LICENSE value 'mozilla_2_0' ignored" is emitted. ``` $ perl Makefile.PL Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Invalid LICENSE value 'mozilla_2_0' ignored Generating a Unix-style Makefile Writing Makefile for Mozilla::CA Invalid LICENSE value 'mozilla_2_0' ignored Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json ``` According to https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#license we should set license "open_source" for MPL 2.0. I prepared a patch for this https://gist.github.com/skaji/451bb3543a9cd631fa2070fe65cf8704 I'm willing to create a pull request to the github repository if you want. Please let me know. Thanks.

Mon Feb 26 08:17:58 2018 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Fri Mar 09 02:51:19 2018 ask [...] perl.org - Correspondence added

Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #97815] Specify license in META
Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:50:56 -0800
To:	bug-Mozilla-CA [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask [...] perl.org>

Hmn, it’s a little goofy to make it less specific, but if that’s what’s supported — sure, pull request would be helpful.

Fri Mar 09 03:25:10 2018 REHSACK [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

RT-Send-CC:

NEILB [...] cpan.org

@Neil - you're bit better connected to the toolchain folks: what needs to be done to support Mozilla 2.0 license in EU::MM and Metacpan?