Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the Path-Router CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 97193
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: Path-Router

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: TIMB [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Could Path::Router be ported to use Moo instead of Moose?
Path::Router is the only part of WebAPI::DBIC that requires Moose. Could Path::Router be ported to use Moo instead of Moose?
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #97193] Could Path::Router be ported to use Moo instead of Moose?
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 23:56:08 -0400
To: bug-Path-Router [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Stevan Little <stevan.little [...] gmail.com>
Tim, Yes, this is a possibility, I don't think we are using any Moose features which would make this not work. I am currently too busy with my intercontinental move to do this, but I am willing to entertain any patches available. - Stevan On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Tim_Bunce via RT < bug-Path-Router@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> Sun Jul 13 19:58:54 2014: Request 97193 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by TIMB > Queue: Path-Router > Subject: Could Path::Router be ported to use Moo instead of Moose? > Broken in: (no value) > Severity: (no value) > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: TIMB@cpan.org > Status: new > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=97193 > > > > Path::Router is the only part of WebAPI::DBIC that requires Moose. > Could Path::Router be ported to use Moo instead of Moose? >