Bug #95382 for File-Patch-Undoable: Test suite fails on most non-Linux systems (patch --dry-run?)

Mon May 05 14:42:40 2014 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

Test suite fails on most non-Linux systems (patch --dry-run?)

At least on freebsd systems the tests fail because the "patch" binary here has no --dry-run option. And, by looking at the manpage, it does not look that there's a replacement for this option. Regards, Slaven

Tue May 06 12:00:48 2014 sharyanto [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On Mon May 05 14:42:40 2014, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text

> At least on freebsd systems the tests fail because the "patch" binary > here has no --dry-run option. And, by looking at the manpage, it does > not look that there's a replacement for this option. > > Regards, > Slaven

I've just released a new version which tries to detect this. Regards, Steven

Tue May 06 12:00:48 2014 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Fri May 09 03:52:15 2014 sharyanto [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

FreeBSD is being skipped now, e.g. http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/d3ce285c-d721-11e3-9f96-e4d5e82f99b1 But all OpenBSD now fail. I suspect 'patch' on OpenBSD doesn't support --dry-run yet don't exit non-zero when given unknown option. Perhaps I'll need to parse the output of 'patch'... or perhaps get my hands on an OpenBSD to try things out. Anyway, TIL there are many versions of 'patch' out there. Regards, Steven On Tue May 06 12:00:48 2014, SHARYANTO wrote: Show quoted text

> On Mon May 05 14:42:40 2014, SREZIC wrote:

> > At least on freebsd systems the tests fail because the "patch" binary > > here has no --dry-run option. And, by looking at the manpage, it does > > not look that there's a replacement for this option. > > > > Regards, > > Slaven

> > > I've just released a new version which tries to detect this. > > Regards, > Steven

Fri Jun 13 09:08:21 2014 sharyanto [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

FreeBSD & OpenBSD now pass. http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=File-Patch-Undoable+0.04 Closing ticket. Regards, Steven On Fri May 09 03:52:15 2014, SHARYANTO wrote: Show quoted text

> FreeBSD is being skipped now, e.g. > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/d3ce285c-d721-11e3-9f96- > e4d5e82f99b1 > > But all OpenBSD now fail. I suspect 'patch' on OpenBSD doesn't support > --dry-run yet don't exit non-zero when given unknown option. Perhaps > I'll need to parse the output of 'patch'... or perhaps get my hands on > an OpenBSD to try things out. Anyway, TIL there are many versions of > 'patch' out there. > > Regards, > Steven > > > On Tue May 06 12:00:48 2014, SHARYANTO wrote:

> > On Mon May 05 14:42:40 2014, SREZIC wrote:

> > > At least on freebsd systems the tests fail because the "patch" > > > binary > > > here has no --dry-run option. And, by looking at the manpage, it > > > does > > > not look that there's a replacement for this option. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Slaven

> > > > > > I've just released a new version which tries to detect this. > > > > Regards, > > Steven

Fri Jun 13 09:08:22 2014 sharyanto [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'