Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the POE CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 95185
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: POE

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: perry.sebastian [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Re: call forks from double test in if statement
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:50:02 -0400
To: bug-POE [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Perry Sebastian <perry.sebastian [...] gmail.com>
A follow up on the previous bug report. Although the IF statement appeared to generate (and suppress) the double call to a post session, the double call may be related to Moose-POE behaviour. It occurred from printing undefined variable values, too. I am calling POE sessions inside a [moose] object, and using wait (count) routines defined as object states. An attempt to retrieve a value from the object hash variable $_[OBJECT]->{ACTIVE_ALIASES} - using an unset key, also generated a double call to a post session. Properly setting the hash key, corrected the double call to one call per loop. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Perry Sebastian <perry.sebastian@gmail.com>wrote: Show quoted text
> Hi, > > I did not find a mention of this from a google search of POE bugs, so I'm > assuming that it could be new. I came across an unusual feature/bug in POE. > This code will generate 2 kernel calls for each loop. Both calls use the > same hash pointer to the args. > > ... > use Moose; > use POE; > > ... > > foreach my $key (keys %$sessions) { > my $args = $sessions->{$key}; > foreach my $k (keys %$args) { > print "show me .. k[$k] and v[".$args->{$k}."]\n"; > } > if(exists $args->{SESSION} and $args->{SESSION}) { > print "Tracer statement...you are here...\n"; > $_[KERNEL]->post( 'regAlias', 'REGISTER', $args ); > } > } > > Commenting out the if(exist... statement will generate 1 kernel call for > each loop...which is the expected behavior. > > >
Rejecting this ticket because it's an extension of existing ticket 95179. I've moved your input from this ticket to the other one. See you there!