On Thu Apr 24 11:41:04 2014, SPUDSOUP wrote:
Show quoted text> I have investigated a bit, and I have a patch that appears to make the
> problem go away. I am not sure if it is safe though.
>
> What do you think?
I agree with this approach. The wrapper provided in Class::MOP is calls the Class::Load version anyway. The only addition that should be made is to list Class::Load as a prerequisite in the Makefile.PL.
It would be good to be able to fix this so that the warning can be done away with and so that future versions of Class::MOP that remove the function entirely will not break this module.
If you don't have the time or interest in maintaining this module, please consider handing it off to someone else. I'd be happy to volunteer for this task if nobody else is appropriate, and you are willing to grant me the permission in PAUSE.