Bug #91637 for IPC-Run: Where's IPC-Run-0.92

Tue Dec 24 06:40:58 2013 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

Where's IPC-Run-0.92_01?

The test reports for IPC-Run-0.92_01 look much better than for 0.92, see http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=IPC-Run%200.92_01 http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=IPC-Run%200.92 but unfortunately I cannot find 0.92_01 anymore on CPAN (BackPAN does not count, I cannot access BackPAN distributions via CPAN.pm's distroprefs). Regards, Slaven

Sat Jan 04 09:32:48 2014 TODDR [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On Tue Dec 24 06:40:58 2013, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text

> The test reports for IPC-Run-0.92_01 look much better than for 0.92, > see > http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=IPC-Run%200.92_01 > http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=IPC-Run%200.92 > but unfortunately I cannot find 0.92_01 anymore on CPAN (BackPAN does > not count, I cannot access BackPAN distributions via CPAN.pm's > distroprefs). > > Regards, > Slaven

I'm sorry, but it's not possible to undo a delete in PAUSE. Also the changes between 0.92_01 and 0.91 are meta only so should be insignificant. You can see the history here: https://github.com/toddr/IPC-Run/

Sat Jan 04 09:32:48 2014 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Sat Jan 04 09:33:09 2014 TODDR [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Please re-open if you need more.

Sat Jan 04 09:33:10 2014 TODDR [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected'

Tue Jan 07 16:12:07 2014 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On 2014-01-04 09:33:09, TODDR wrote: Show quoted text

> Please re-open if you need more.

Not needed — I am actually concerned about the pty.t test failures (other tickets for this issue exist) and was hoping that this problem was solved in 0.92_01. Regards, Slaven

Bug #91637 for IPC-Run: Where's IPC-Run-0.92_01?