Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Module-Implementation CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 90157
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: Module-Implementation

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: STEVENL [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Unimportant
Broken in: 0.07
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Missing Test::CPAN::Changes prerequisite
This prereq caused my installation to fail. You could make it optional like the other author release tests.
On Fri Nov 08 12:06:40 2013, STEVENL wrote: Show quoted text
> This prereq caused my installation to fail. You could make it optional > like the other author release tests.
Why are you running tests with AUTHOR_TESTING or RELEASE_TESTING set to true? Unless you're running tests from a git repo via "dzil test --release" there's never a good reason to do this. There's a reason these are called "release tests" ;)
On 2013-11-08 09:11:49, DROLSKY wrote: Show quoted text
> On Fri Nov 08 12:06:40 2013, STEVENL wrote:
> > This prereq caused my installation to fail. You could make it > > optional > > like the other author release tests.
> > Why are you running tests with AUTHOR_TESTING or RELEASE_TESTING set > to true? > > Unless you're running tests from a git repo via "dzil test --release" > there's never a good reason to do this. There's a reason these are > called "release tests" ;)
Things required by the release tests should probably be declared as 'develop' prereqs -- then anyone who insists on running with AUTHOR_TESTING turned on can satisfy those prereqs and continue on their merry way.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #90157] Missing Test::CPAN::Changes prerequisite
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:56:56 -0600 (CST)
To: Karen Etheridge via RT <bug-Module-Implementation [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Dave Rolsky <autarch [...] urth.org>
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Karen Etheridge via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> Queue: Module-Implementation > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=90157 > > > On 2013-11-08 09:11:49, DROLSKY wrote:
>> On Fri Nov 08 12:06:40 2013, STEVENL wrote:
>>> This prereq caused my installation to fail. You could make it >>> optional >>> like the other author release tests.
>> >> Why are you running tests with AUTHOR_TESTING or RELEASE_TESTING set >> to true? >> >> Unless you're running tests from a git repo via "dzil test --release" >> there's never a good reason to do this. There's a reason these are >> called "release tests" ;)
> > > Things required by the release tests should probably be declared as 'develop' prereqs -- then anyone who insists on running with AUTHOR_TESTING turned on can satisfy those prereqs and continue on their merry way.
Isn't this what "dzil authordeps" is for? It seems silly to declare what dzil can calculate. -dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/