Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Memoize CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 89441
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: Memoize

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: dom [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Unimportant
Broken in: 1.03
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: POD errors
The attached patch corrects a POD error which causes pod2man to at the very least puts a warning in the resulting manpage, and at worse exit non-zero.
Subject: Memoize.pod-fix.patch
diff -urN Memoize-1.03/Memoize.pm Memoize-1.03.new/Memoize.pm --- Memoize-1.03/Memoize.pm 2012-04-22 21:15:26.000000000 +0000 +++ Memoize-1.03.new/Memoize.pm 2013-10-13 22:39:20.000000000 +0000 @@ -748,6 +748,8 @@ being called only once, and both subsequent calls return C<3> from the cache, regardless of the calling context. +=back + =head3 List values in scalar context Consider this function: @@ -797,8 +799,6 @@ the disk file under keys that begin with C<S:>, and list context return values under keys that begin with C<L:>. -=back - =head1 OTHER FACILITIES =head2 C<unmemoize>
On Sun Oct 13 18:49:06 2013, DOM wrote: Show quoted text
> The attached patch corrects a POD error which causes pod2man to at the > very least puts a warning in the resulting manpage, and at worse exit > non-zero.
Mark, would it be possible to apply these patches and release an updated Memoize to CPAN? I request this because there is a ticket in the Perl 5 bug queue (https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=124332) recommending certain changes in the way the core distribution handles POD formatting errors. To deal with that ticket it would be helpful to clear up all POD formatting problems in modules such as Memoize which are distributed with core. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #89441] POD errors
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:31:49 +0000
To: bug-Memoize [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Mark Dominus <mjd [...] plover.com>
I'm too busy to look at this right now. If I haven't replied by Thursday, can you please poke me?
On Sat Apr 18 16:31:58 2015, mjd@plover.com wrote: Show quoted text
> > I'm too busy to look at this right now. If I haven't replied by > Thursday, can you please poke me?
Which Thursday? Poke. Tony