Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Module-Build-Tiny CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 89406
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: Module-Build-Tiny
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: ribasushi [...] leporine.io
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Wishlist
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Fri Oct 11 05:59:25 2013 ribasushi [...] leporine.io - Ticket created
Subject: MBT should probably be EUMM only, instead of self-hosting
It has a *very* wide configure_requires depchain, and the current state of affairs leads to code like this: https://github.com/dbsrgits/dbix-class/blob/master/maint/travis-ci_scripts/30_before_script.bash#L109
  Wed Oct 16 18:19:16 2013 LEONT [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Fri Oct 11 05:59:25 2013, RIBASUSHI wrote: Show quoted text
> It has a *very* wide configure_requires depchain, and the current > state of affairs leads to code like this: > > https://github.com/dbsrgits/dbix-class/blob/master/maint/travis- > ci_scripts/30_before_script.bash#L109
I can understand its annoying for your kind of setup, but the testing value of using it for actual deployment is too big to give up for a little convenience on legacy setups. Sorry but I have to reject this request. Leon
  Wed Oct 16 18:19:16 2013 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Wed Oct 16 18:19:16 2013 LEONT [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected'
  Thu Oct 17 07:05:00 2013 ribasushi [...] leporine.io - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #89406] MBT should probably be EUMM only, instead of self-hosting
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:04:39 +0000
To: Leon Timmermans via RT <bug-Module-Build-Tiny [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: ribasushi [...] cpan.org
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:19:16PM -0400, Leon Timmermans via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89406 > > > On Fri Oct 11 05:59:25 2013, RIBASUSHI wrote:
> > It has a *very* wide configure_requires depchain, and the current > > state of affairs leads to code like this: > > > > https://github.com/dbsrgits/dbix-class/blob/master/maint/travis- > > ci_scripts/30_before_script.bash#L109
> > I can understand its annoying for your kind of setup, but the testing value of using it for actual deployment is too big to give up for a little convenience on legacy setups. > > Sorry but I have to reject this request. >
Yep, as per IRC conversation I have no problem with that line of reasoning. Perhaps way down the road when MBT is "feature complete" this could be revisited. Cheers