Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Const-Fast CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 89315
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Const-Fast

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: dsteinbrunner [...] pobox.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: 0.014
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: test failure on 5.19.4
The following happens on 5.19.4 but has no issue on 5.18.1: t/10-basics.t ............. 1/? Use of uninitialized value $this in pattern match (m//) at t/10-basics.t line 45. # Failed test 'Modify array' # at t/10-basics.t line 45. # undef # doesn't match '(?^:\AModification of a read-only value attempted at t\/10\-basics\.t line 45\.\Z)' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 25. t/10-basics.t ............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/25 subtests
On Mon Oct 07 19:09:11 2013, dsteinbrunner@pobox.com wrote: Show quoted text
> The following happens on 5.19.4 but has no issue on 5.18.1: > > t/10-basics.t ............. 1/? Use of uninitialized value $this in > pattern match (m//) at t/10-basics.t line 45. > > # Failed test 'Modify array' > # at t/10-basics.t line 45. > # undef > # doesn't match '(?^:\AModification of a read-only value attempted > at t\/10\-basics\.t line 45\.\Z)' > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 25. > t/10-basics.t ............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, > 0x100) > Failed 1/25 subtests
Yeah, I'm aware of this regression in core. There isn't much consensus on p5p on how to deal with it though, I can't fix it in the module itself. Leon
Just as a reference, the bleadperl ticket is here: https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=119189
On Mon Oct 14 17:11:34 2013, LEONT wrote: Show quoted text
> On Mon Oct 07 19:09:11 2013, dsteinbrunner@pobox.com wrote:
> > The following happens on 5.19.4 but has no issue on 5.18.1: > > > > t/10-basics.t ............. 1/? Use of uninitialized value $this in > > pattern match (m//) at t/10-basics.t line 45. > > > > # Failed test 'Modify array' > > # at t/10-basics.t line 45. > > # undef > > # doesn't match '(?^:\AModification of a read-only value > > attempted > > at t\/10\-basics\.t line 45\.\Z)' > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 25. > > t/10-basics.t ............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, > > 0x100) > > Failed 1/25 subtests
> > Yeah, I'm aware of this regression in core. There isn't much consensus > on p5p on how to deal with it though, I can't fix it in the module > itself. > > Leon
This has been resolved in blead, closing it now. Leon