Bug #88627 for MooseX-Getopt: Fails with Moose 2.1100-TRIAL

Thu Sep 12 06:52:49 2013 ANDK [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

Fails with Moose 2.1100-TRAIL

As per subject. You probably know better than me but in case you didn't it's better I tell you than the other way round. Cheers,

Thu Sep 12 13:00:34 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On 2013-09-12 03:52:49, ANDK wrote: Show quoted text

> As per subject. > > You probably know better than me but in case you didn't it's better I > tell you than the other way round. > > Cheers,

Do you have a stack trace handy? The only issue with Moose-2.1100 that I'm aware of is due to a use of a new Class::MOP deprecation in MooseX::Role::Parameterized (which MXGO uses), and sartak has now released a fixed MXRP -- so other than bumping the dependency in MXGO, there isn't anything to do here. I'll leave this ticket open for now in case there is something else afoot.

Thu Sep 12 13:00:35 2013 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Thu Sep 12 13:01:16 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Subject:

Fails with Moose 2.1100-TRIAL

I can certainly update MXGO to not fail on upstream warnings -- I'll do that tonight.

Thu Sep 12 13:03:55 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Subject changed from 'Fails with Moose 2.1100-TRAIL' to 'Fails with Moose 2.1100-TRIAL'

Thu Sep 12 13:03:55 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Taken

Thu Sep 12 15:06:26 2013 andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR [...] franz.ak.mind.de - Correspondence added

CC:	ANDK [...] cpan.org
Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #88627] Fails with Moose 2.1100-TRAIL
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:06:09 +0200
To:	bug-MooseX-Getopt [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Andreas Koenig <andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR [...] franz.ak.mind.de>

"Karen Etheridge via RT" <bug-MooseX-Getopt@rt.cpan.org> writes: Show quoted text

> Do you have a stack trace handy?

I had not checked, so now I'm surprised to find two different ones: Name "Config::Any::YAML::NO_YAML_XS_WARNING" used only once: possible typo at t/112_configfile_constructor_arg.t line 15. # Failed test 'no (unexpected) warnings (via END block)' # at t/112_configfile_constructor_arg.t line 0. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 3. t/112_configfile_constructor_arg.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/3 subtests Most reports skip this test when MooseX::SimpleConfig is not available. The other one I found on cpantesters as in http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/34282381 -- andreas

Fri Sep 13 14:29:38 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

These two failures should be resolved with 0.58.

Fri Sep 13 14:29:40 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Thu Oct 23 18:35:47 2014 ether [...] cpan.org - Fixed in 0.58 added