Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the CPANPLUS CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 8744
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: CPANPLUS

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: david [...] kineticode.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



To: bug-cpanplus [...] rt.cpan.org
From: David Wheeler <david [...] kineticode.com>
Subject: 0.050_01 Cannot validate Build.PL perl version spec
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 10:43:32 -0800
Module::Build users sometimes specify a perl version in their requirements: requires => { perl => '5.6.1' }, I guess CPANPLUS doesn't know this, because it tries to manage it as a module: Creating new 'Build' script for 'XML-Genx' version '0.07' [ERROR] Unable to find 'perl' in the module tree -- unable to satisfy prerequisites I *think* that the required perl version is the only thing that will appear in the requirements that is not a module, but you might want to ask module-build-general@lists.sourceforge.net to be sure.
From: David E.Wheeler <david [...] kineticode.com>
Subject: Re: [cpan #8744] AutoReply: 0.050_01 Cannot validate Build.PL perl version spec
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 09:25:55 -0800
To: bug-CPANPLUS [...] rt.cpan.org
RT-Send-Cc:
I just installed a module that uses the perl requirement in Build.PL with 0.50_02 and it seemed to work. Did you fix it, or has it become a heisenbug?
From: "Jos I. Boumans" <kane [...] dwim.org>
Subject: Re: [cpan #8744] AutoReply: 0.050_01 Cannot validate Build.PL perl version spec
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:19:43 +0100
To: bug-CPANPLUS [...] rt.cpan.org
RT-Send-Cc:
On Dec 13, 2004, at 4:15 PM, David Wheeler via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> > This message about CPANPLUS was sent to you by david@kineticode.com > <david@kineticode.com> via rt.cpan.org > > Full context and any attached attachments can be found at: > <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8744 > > > I just installed a module that uses the perl requirement in Build.PL > with 0.50_02 and it seemed to work. Did you fix it, or has it become a > heisenbug?
As i thought i'd already mentioned, fixing a more generic problem about dependencies + module::build also fixed the 'perl' requirement problem we had.. so yes, it's meant to be gone :) -- Jos Boumans How do I prove I am not crazy to people who are? CPANPLUS http://cpanplus.sf.net