Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Pod-Coverage CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 82195
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: Pod-Coverage
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: ether [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Wishlist
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Sun Dec 23 20:55:14 2012 ether [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: Add syntax for "look in this other file for all the docs"
For dists with an inheritance heirarchy, or multiple role composition or whatever, it's often the case that something gets documented in a different file than where it actually is defined. 17:52 < rjbs> ether: Seriously, though, I'd love a Pod::Coverage::TrustPod patch to say something like: package:XYZ to say
  Sun Dec 23 20:56:17 2012 ether [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Show quoted text
> 17:52 < rjbs> ether: Seriously, though, I'd love a > Pod::Coverage::TrustPod patch to say something like: package:XYZ to
say "and trust anything covered in there"
  Sun Dec 23 20:56:18 2012 ether [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Tue Nov 05 18:25:27 2013 rjbs [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
I believe this belongs in Pod-Coverage. It is useful to general pod coverage tests, not only to ones in which extra "this is documented" markers appear in the Pod. Do you agree? -- rjbs
  Tue Nov 05 18:39:31 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On 2013-11-05 15:25:27, RJBS wrote: Show quoted text
> I believe this belongs in Pod-Coverage. It is useful to general pod > coverage tests, not only to ones in which extra "this is documented" > markers appear in the Pod. > > Do you agree?
Agreed; I'll move the ticket.
  Tue Nov 05 18:39:40 2013 ether [...] cpan.org - Queue changed from Pod-Coverage-TrustPod to Pod-Coverage