Subject: | License is same as Perl or Artistic 2.0? |
Date: | Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:08:41 +0100 |
To: | bug-Clone-Fast [...] rt.cpan.org |
From: | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil [...] debian.org> |
Hi
I was going to update the Debian package to upstream version 0.97 and
noticed the following change:
Readme.md still states:
----cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut-----
COPYRIGHT AND LICENCE
Put the correct copyright and licence information here.
Copyright (C) 2006 by Trevor Hall
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the same terms as Perl itself, either Perl version 5.8.5 or,
at your option, any later version of Perl 5 you may have available.
----cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut-----
But there was a change in the Clone::Fast module:
https://metacpan.org/diff/file/?target=WAZZUTEKE/Clone-Fast-0.97/lib/Clone/Fast.pm&source=WAZZUTEKE/Clone-Fast-0.96.1/lib/Clone/Fast.pm
so the change from 'same as Perl (i.e. Artistic or GPL) to Artistic
2.0. Was this intentional?
Many thanks if you could clarify this!
Regards,
Salvatore
Message body not shown because it is not plain text.