Thanks for the bug report! If there is ever another release of RPC::Any, I'm sure that whoever does that release will be sure to follow up on this obviously very serious issue. If you would like to submit a patch, I'm sure whoever the future maintainer of this module ends up being would absolutely love to accept and integrate this very simple patch.
-Max
On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:57 PM, "Frédéric Buclin via RT" <bug-RPC-Any@rt.cpan.org> wrote:
Show quoted text> Thu Nov 15 18:57:43 2012: Request 81221 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by lpsolit@gmail.com
> Queue: RPC-Any
> Subject: The POD says that RPC::Any is heavily used by Bugzilla, but Bugzilla never depended on it
> Broken in: (no value)
> Severity: (no value)
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: lpsolit@gmail.com
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=81221 >
>
>
>
http://search.cpan.org/~mkanat/RPC-Any-1.00/lib/RPC/Any.pm#BUGS pretends
> that:
>
> "it has very extensive tests and is being heavily used in a major
> production application (Bugzilla)."
>
> This is totally wrong as Bugzilla never depended on RPC::Any. Giving
> users the feeling that it's safe to use RPC::Any by using the name of a
> respectable application like Bugzilla is dishonest. The last part of
> this sentence must be removed.
>
