Subject: | wish: inverse function |
I just want to see I'm a fan and I'd like to see the inverse function made available. I know it's alreaady on the documented TODO list. :)
CGI::State is mentioned as provided the inverse conversation, but the sytnax it generates is not compatible:
item[0].foo
vs.
item.0.foo
Alternately, if you could also accept the CGI::State syntax, that might be helpful. I personally prefer the bracketless syntax.
Mark