Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Net-DNS CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 79569
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Net-DNS

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: tlhackque [...] yahoo.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Wishlist
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: AXFR not settng answerfrom
Resolver axfr doesn't set answerfrom() It should.
It should. Looking at the code I see that axfr is only tried from the first nameserver as well. This has to be fixed too. On Tue 11 Sep 2012 08:20:17, tlhackque wrote: Show quoted text
> Resolver axfr doesn't set answerfrom() > > It should.
On Thu 13 Sep 2012 08:47:57, NLNETLABS wrote: Show quoted text
> It should. Looking at the code I see that axfr is only tried from the > first nameserver as well. This has to be fixed too.
Setting answerfrom is fixed since 0.69. As for the using only the first nameserver; Perhaps that is too much intelligence for Net::DNS::Resolver. We are not trying to implement a full top-quality resolver in perl. You could also easily shift or shuffle nameservers on axfr failure yourself. Thank you for reporting, -- Willem
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #79569] AXFR not settng answerfrom
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 20:07:43 -0500
To: bug-Net-DNS [...] rt.cpan.org
From: tlhackque <tlhackque [...] yahoo.com>
On 16-Dec-12 16:12, NLnet Labs via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=79569 > > > On Thu 13 Sep 2012 08:47:57, NLNETLABS wrote:
>> It should. Looking at the code I see that axfr is only tried from the >> first nameserver as well. This has to be fixed too.
> Setting answerfrom is fixed since 0.69. As for the using only the first > nameserver; Perhaps that is too much intelligence for > Net::DNS::Resolver. We are not trying to implement a full top-quality > resolver in perl. You could also easily shift or shuffle nameservers on > axfr failure yourself. > > Thank you for reporting, > > -- Willem
Thanks for fixing answerfrom. As for not using all the nameservers - that wasn't in my report; a developer noted that. when he took a first look at my report. However, Net::DNS does iterate over all nameservers in other parts of the code - why not be consistent? It's hard to justify that axfr is different from query or update... and as I noted in another bug report, with IPv6 finally coming on-line, hosts with multiple addresses and user connectivity to only some of them will be more common, not less. -- This communication may not represent my employer's views, if any, on the matters discussed.
On Sun 16 Dec 2012 20:10:42, tlhackque wrote: Show quoted text
> However, Net::DNS does iterate over all nameservers in other parts of > the code - why not be consistent?
No problem, but then I give this ticket the feature request status.
From: rwfranks [...] acm.org
On Sun Dec 16 20:10:42 2012, tlhackque wrote: Show quoted text
> [snip] As for not using all the nameservers - > that wasn't in my report; a developer noted that. when he took a first > look at my report. >
Implemented in 0.74_4
Implemented (at least at connection setup) in 0.75