Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Image-ExifTool CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 79395
Status: resolved
Worked: 5 min
Priority: 0/
Queue: Image-ExifTool

People
Owner: EXIFTOOL [...] cpan.org
Requestors: xstej70 [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 9.04



Subject: Bug: Samsung NX lens database is incomplete
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:41:02 +0200
To: bug-Image-ExifTool [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Jaroslav Stepanek <xstej70 [...] gmail.com>
Hello, I just did some research on the Samsung NX lenses in the exiv2 source code. Two lenses from the current portfolio were missing so I added them and I've also rewritten the names of other lenses (from samsungmn.cpp): { 0, N_("Built-in") }, { 1, N_("Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake") }, { 2, N_("Samsung NX 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OIS") }, { 3, N_("Samsung NX 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED OIS") }, { 4, N_("Samsung NX 20-50mm F3.5-5.6 ED") }, { 6, N_("Samsung NX 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 ED OIS") }, { 5, N_("Samsung NX 20mm F2.8 Pancake") }, { 7, N_("Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA") }, { 8, N_("Samsung NX 16mm F2.4 Pancake") }, { 9, N_("Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA") } The original exiv2 list is the same as in exiftool. I don't know whether the changes will get accepted in exiv2 (I don't see why not) but will this list make it to exiftool as well? I am also planning on updating the list as soon as new lenses are released (if I can come by a SRW file to check the ID). Regards, Jaroslav Stepanek
Excellent, thanks! I have added the 2 new entries. For now I will leave the "NX" out of the names. - Phil
The lenses were renamed as suggested in ExifTool 9.03.