Subject: | Docs should reference Tkx |
Date: | Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:36:30 +0100 |
To: | bugs-Tk [...] rt.cpan.org |
From: | Matt S Trout <mst [...] shadowcat.co.uk> |
Since the tkdocs.com examples use Tkx, and the Tk.pm version of the tk code
is getting quite old now, I think it would be good for the Tk docs to
reference Tkx and make it clear that there are strong reasons for considering
Tkx instead for new code. This would also give you somewhere to include an
explanation of why you might -not- choose Tkx for new code - I can't
immediately see any reason to start new projects with Tk.pm but if that's
because I'm ignorant of the reasons for it then rather than simply telling
me why I'm wrong it'd be nice to have a POD section that tells everybody :)
--
Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue
http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/
Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst
commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.