Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the XML-Simple CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 79228
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: XML-Simple

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: mst [...] shadowcat.co.uk
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 2.21



Subject: Better recommendations in STATUS section
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:41:56 +0100
To: bugs-XML-Simple [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Matt S Trout <mst [...] shadowcat.co.uk>
You might want to ponder adding XML::Twig - XML::LibXML is very overkill for simple tasks and hard to learn, so I'm still regularly seeing newbies ignoring the warnings and trying to use XML::Simple anyway. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
On Sun Aug 26 07:42:08 2012, mst@shadowcat.co.uk wrote: Show quoted text
> You might want to ponder adding XML::Twig - XML::LibXML is very overkill > for simple tasks and hard to learn, so I'm still regularly seeing newbies > ignoring the warnings and trying to use XML::Simple anyway.
I'm happy to add a mention of XML:Twig although in my experience Twig really only makes sense to Perl programmers. The newbies that I hear from are typically having trouble with XML::Simple because they don't know references and can't understand the output of Data::Dumper. These users are not XML::Twig's target audience.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #79228] Better recommendations in STATUS section
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:53:39 +0100
To: Grant McLean via RT <bug-XML-Simple [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Matt S Trout <mst [...] shadowcat.co.uk>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 05:35:13PM -0400, Grant McLean via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> I'm happy to add a mention of XML:Twig although in my experience Twig > really only makes sense to Perl programmers.
True, but XML::LibXML only really makes sense to people who already know the DOM. Hence I'm suggesting mentioning -both- and hoping that's an improvement. I'm not really sure what's out there that'd make more sense to people new to perl as well as XML - XML is enough of a bag of razorblades on its own :/ -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
Fixed in release 2.21. Thanks for the report.