From: | gregoa [...] cpan.org |
Subject: | libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: tests failed |
This bug has been forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/680790
--->--->
Source: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Show quoted text
> debian/rules build
> dh build
> dh_testdir
> dh_auto_configure
> Created MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json
> Creating new 'Build' script for 'IO-Async-Loop-Epoll' version '0.12'
> dh_auto_build
> Building IO-Async-Loop-Epoll
> dh_auto_test
> t/00use.t ........... ok
> t/01loop-io.t ....... ok
>
> # Failed test 'One ->loop_once(1) sufficient for a single 0.1 second timer'
> # at /usr/share/perl5/IO/Async/LoopTests.pm line 481.
> # got: '2'
> # expected: '1'
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 26.
> t/02loop-timer.t ....
> Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> Failed 1/26 subtests
> t/03loop-signal.t ... ok
> t/04loop-idle.t ..... ok
> t/05loop-child.t .... ok
> t/06loop-control.t .. ok
> t/99pod.t ........... ok
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> t/02loop-timer.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 26 Failed: 1)
> Failed test: 20
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Files=8, Tests=105, 15 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.06 sys + 0.49 cusr 0.13 csys = 0.72 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> Failed 1/8 test programs. 1/105 subtests failed.
> dh_auto_test: perl Build test returned exit code 255
> make: *** [build] Error 255
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/07/08/libio-async-loop-epoll-perl_0.12-1_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
<--<--
Note that
- this is 0.12; 0.13 needs Linux::Epoll which isn't packaged in Debian yet
- I can't reproduce the bug but Lucas could (cf. the original bug report)
Thanks in advance,
gregor herrmann, Debian Perl Group