Bug #78554 for XML-SemanticDiff: possible bug in SemanticDiff 1.0

Tue Jul 24 13:20:02 2012 Jeffery.Cunningham [...] amd.com - Ticket created

Subject:	possible bug in SemanticDiff 1.0
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:19:33 +0000
To:	"bug-XML-SemanticDiff [...] rt.cpan.org" <bug-XML-SemanticDiff [...] rt.cpan.org>
From:	"Cunningham, Jeffery" <Jeffery.Cunningham [...] amd.com>

Unless I am missing a step, an element is being reported as rogue element but it exists in xml file compared with. I discovered that a element can be reported as new rogue element in new file if not in same location as old file. Example if old file contains: <classes name="Zanoply::AccessLogic"> <all_members name="accessLogic"/> <all_members name="DBUS"/> </classes> And new file contains: <classes name="Zanoply::AccessLogic"> <all_members name="accessLogic"/> <all_members name="SPR"/> <all_members name="DBUS"/> </classes> Then DBUS is reported both as a change in attribute value (which is ok), but also reported as new rogue element in new file, although it exists in both files. Jeff Cunningham Department: Software Infrastructure [cid:image001.png@01CD6996.4B08A100]

Download image001.png
image/png 11.9k

Thu Jul 26 20:57:59 2012 khampton [...] totalcinema.com - Correspondence added

Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #78554] possible bug in SemanticDiff 1.0
Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:57:40 -0700
To:	bug-XML-SemanticDiff [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Kip Hampton <khampton [...] totalcinema.com>

Hey Jeff, Thanks for the report. I'll dig into this at the weekend to see if I can see what's up. Cheers, -kip On 7/24/12 10:20 AM, Cunningham, Jeffery via RT wrote: Show quoted text

> Tue Jul 24 13:20:02 2012: Request 78554 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by Jeffery.Cunningham@amd.com > Queue: XML-SemanticDiff > Subject: possible bug in SemanticDiff 1.0 > Broken in: (no value) > Severity: (no value) > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: Jeffery.Cunningham@amd.com > Status: new > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=78554 > > > > Unless I am missing a step, an element is being reported as rogue element but it exists in xml file compared with. > > I discovered that a element can be reported as new rogue element in new file if not in same location as old file. Example if old file contains: > > <classes name="Zanoply::AccessLogic"> > <all_members name="accessLogic"/> > <all_members name="DBUS"/> > </classes> > > And new file contains: > > <classes name="Zanoply::AccessLogic"> > <all_members name="accessLogic"/> > <all_members name="SPR"/> > <all_members name="DBUS"/> > </classes> > > Then DBUS is reported both as a change in attribute value (which is ok), but also reported as new rogue element in new file, although it exists in both files. > > > Jeff Cunningham > Department: Software Infrastructure > > [cid:image001.png@01CD6996.4B08A100] > > >

Thu Jul 26 20:58:00 2012 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Fri Jul 27 08:52:35 2012 Jeffery.Cunningham [...] amd.com - Correspondence added

Subject:	RE: [rt.cpan.org #78554] possible bug in SemanticDiff 1.0
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:52:11 +0000
To:	"bug-XML-SemanticDiff [...] rt.cpan.org" <bug-XML-SemanticDiff [...] rt.cpan.org>
From:	"Cunningham, Jeffery" <Jeffery.Cunningham [...] amd.com>

Thanks for your response. I attached files I am using for test. I tried the patch dated 2006 for version 0.95 and also tried latest version 1.0. Much appreciated Jeff Cunningham Department: Software Infrastructure Show quoted text

-----Original Message----- From: khampton@totalcinema.com via RT [mailto:bug-XML-SemanticDiff@rt.cpan.org] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 7:58 PM To: Cunningham, Jeffery Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #78554] possible bug in SemanticDiff 1.0 <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=78554 > Hey Jeff, Thanks for the report. I'll dig into this at the weekend to see if I can see what's up. Cheers, -kip On 7/24/12 10:20 AM, Cunningham, Jeffery via RT wrote:

> Tue Jul 24 13:20:02 2012: Request 78554 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by Jeffery.Cunningham@amd.com > Queue: XML-SemanticDiff > Subject: possible bug in SemanticDiff 1.0 > Broken in: (no value) > Severity: (no value) > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: Jeffery.Cunningham@amd.com > Status: new > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=78554 > > > > Unless I am missing a step, an element is being reported as rogue element but it exists in xml file compared with. > > I discovered that a element can be reported as new rogue element in new file if not in same location as old file. Example if old file contains: > > <classes name="Zanoply::AccessLogic"> > <all_members name="accessLogic"/> > <all_members name="DBUS"/> > </classes> > > And new file contains: > > <classes name="Zanoply::AccessLogic"> > <all_members name="accessLogic"/> > <all_members name="SPR"/> > <all_members name="DBUS"/> > </classes> > > Then DBUS is reported both as a change in attribute value (which is ok), but also reported as new rogue element in new file, although it exists in both files. > > > Jeff Cunningham > Department: Software Infrastructure > > [cid:image001.png@01CD6996.4B08A100] > > >

Download difftest.zip
application/x-zip-compressed 1.4k

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.