Well the good news is that MediaWiki::DumpFile is much much much much much
better than Parse::MediaWikiDump - faster in every way and easier to use.
If you don't have legacy code you are trying to work with
you definitely want to use MediaWiki::DumpFile instead of
Parse::MediaWikiDump.
Have fun playing with the MediaWiki dump files, it can be a total blast!
Cheers,
Tyler
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM, dmacks@netspace.org via RT <
bug-Parse-MediaWikiDump@rt.cpan.org> wrote:
Show quoted text> Queue: Parse-MediaWikiDump
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=78292 >
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:57:29 -0400, Tyler Riddle via RT
> <bug-Parse-MediaWikiDump@rt.cpan.org> wrote:
> <URL:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=78292 >
> >
> > Well that's odd, I don't remember ever dealing with Padwalker or why it
> may
> > have been added. I don't believe there is a current dep there but I also
> > don't know why it would have been added to the metafile.
> >
> > Also I don't know why anyone would be using Parse::MediaWikiDump anymore
> -
> > it's depreciated, the documentation says it is no longer maintained, and
> to
> > use the backwards compatibility mode of MediaWiki::DumpFile.
>
> I encountered the module via recommendation at
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dump and the examples page
> linked from there at
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Computer_help_desk/ParseMediaWikiDump
>
> I now see that there's a note from last year on the talk-page of that
> latter one about the P::MWD situation and requesting the examples be
> updated:(
>
> dan
>
> --
> Daniel Macks
> dmacks@netspace.org
>
>
>
>
--
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the
universe. -- Carl Sagan