Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the MooseX-Privacy CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 77053
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: MooseX-Privacy

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: xenoterracide [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: private/protected functions
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:16:17 -0500
To: bugs-moosex-privacy [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide [...] gmail.com>
would you consider adding `private`, `protected` functions for sugar? I imagine this would be the same as the `private_method/protected_method` you have now, but it would be cleaner sugar in my opinion. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com
On 2012-05-08T00:16:26+01:00, XENO wrote: Show quoted text
> would you consider adding `private`, `protected` functions for sugar? > I imagine this would be the same as the > `private_method/protected_method` you have now, but it would be > cleaner sugar in my opinion.
Take a look at MooseX::DeclareX::Privacy.