Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Tatsumaki CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 76384
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: Tatsumaki

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in:
  • 0.1013
  • 0.101301
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Tests fail with bleadperl ($^WARNING_BITS related?)
See subject --- tests started failing since a couple of bleadperl releases (see also http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tatsumaki-0.1013 ) Maybe it's related to the $^WARNING_BITS hacks done elsewhere (common::sense or so?). Regards, Slaven
RT-Send-CC: schmorp [...] schmorp.de
On Sat Apr 07 14:47:05 2012, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> See subject --- tests started failing since a couple of bleadperl > releases (see also http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tatsumaki-0.1013 ) > Maybe it's related to the $^WARNING_BITS hacks done elsewhere > (common::sense or so?).
These warnings are coming from AnyEvent, which inlines the equivalent of common::sense. So it seems that AnyEvent needs the same change that has already been applied to common::sense.
On Sat Apr 07 20:40:11 2012, SPROUT wrote: Show quoted text
> On Sat Apr 07 14:47:05 2012, SREZIC wrote:
> > See subject --- tests started failing since a couple of bleadperl > > releases (see also http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tatsumaki-
> 0.1013 )
> > Maybe it's related to the $^WARNING_BITS hacks done elsewhere > > (common::sense or so?).
> > These warnings are coming from AnyEvent, which inlines the equivalent > of common::sense. > > So it seems that AnyEvent needs the same change that has already been > applied to > common::sense.
But the tests actually pass for me, even though warnings appear.
On 2012-04-07 20:47:13, SPROUT wrote: Show quoted text
> On Sat Apr 07 20:40:11 2012, SPROUT wrote:
> > On Sat Apr 07 14:47:05 2012, SREZIC wrote:
> > > See subject --- tests started failing since a couple of bleadperl > > > releases (see also http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tatsumaki-
> > 0.1013 )
> > > Maybe it's related to the $^WARNING_BITS hacks done elsewhere > > > (common::sense or so?).
> > > > These warnings are coming from AnyEvent, which inlines the equivalent > > of common::sense. > > > > So it seems that AnyEvent needs the same change that has already been > > applied to > > common::sense.
> > But the tests actually pass for me, even though warnings appear.
Do you have Test::Warn and Moose installed? If these are not installed, then the problematic test (application_with_moose.t) is skipped (using Test::Requires magic). Regards, Slaven
On Sun Apr 08 14:29:16 2012, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> On 2012-04-07 20:47:13, SPROUT wrote:
> > On Sat Apr 07 20:40:11 2012, SPROUT wrote:
> > > On Sat Apr 07 14:47:05 2012, SREZIC wrote:
> > > > See subject --- tests started failing since a couple of bleadperl > > > > releases (see also http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tatsumaki-
> > > 0.1013 )
> > > > Maybe it's related to the $^WARNING_BITS hacks done elsewhere > > > > (common::sense or so?).
> > > > > > These warnings are coming from AnyEvent, which inlines the equivalent > > > of common::sense. > > > > > > So it seems that AnyEvent needs the same change that has already been > > > applied to > > > common::sense.
> > > > But the tests actually pass for me, even though warnings appear.
> > Do you have Test::Warn and Moose installed? If these are not installed, > then the problematic test (application_with_moose.t) is skipped (using > Test::Requires magic).
With Test::Warn and Moose I do get those failures.
On Sat Apr 07 14:47:05 2012, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> See subject --- tests started failing since a couple of bleadperl > releases (see also http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tatsumaki-0.1013 ) > Maybe it's related to the $^WARNING_BITS hacks done elsewhere > (common::sense or so?). > > Regards, > Slaven
This should have been fixed by the release of AnyEvent 7.0 (based on the Changes file; I have not tested it.)