Subject: | Docs recommend Badger as a replacement instead of Moose/etc. |
Date: | Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:54:08 +0000 |
To: | bugs-Class-Base [...] rt.cpan.org |
From: | Matt S Trout <mst [...] shadowcat.co.uk> |
Since nobody to my knowledge other than the author uses Badger, and the
original justification for Badger was a mistaken belief that Moose would
break compatibility as the Perl6 spec changed (which ABW then dishonestly
retconned 1984-style in the documentation rather than make it clear that
his entire reason for developing it was a mistake, and that the only
reason for continuing was inertia on his part), Class::Base should
recommend Moose/Moo/Mo instead as a usable replacement object system.
--
Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue
http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/
Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst
commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.