Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the URI CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 74644
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: URI
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: dwheeler [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Thu Feb 02 19:19:02 2012 dwheeler [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: Inconsistent URI Encoding
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:18:47 -0800
To: bug-uri [...] rt.cpan.org
From: "David E. Wheeler" <dwheeler [...] cpan.org>
URI and URI::Escape are inconsistent in their encoding: perl -MURI -MURI::Escape -E 'say URI::Escape::uri_escape("foo\@bar.com"); my $uri = URI->new; $uri->path_segments("foo\@bar.com"); say $uri' foo%40bar.com foo@bar.com I *think* that URI.pm gets it right, if I’m reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding correctly. Thanks, David
  Thu Feb 02 19:21:42 2012 dwheeler [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #74644] AutoReply: Inconsistent URI Encoding
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:21:33 -0800
To: bug-URI [...] rt.cpan.org
From: "David E. Wheeler" <dwheeler [...] cpan.org>
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Bugs in URI via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> I *think* that URI.pm gets it right, if I’m reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encodingcorrectly.
Er, no, maybe URI::Escape gets it right? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 lists @ as reserved. So I guess URI.pm does not get it right. This shit really should not be so confusing! ;-P Thanks, David
  Thu Feb 02 21:49:53 2012 dwheeler [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #74644] AutoReply: Inconsistent URI Encoding
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:49:40 -0800
To: bug-URI [...] rt.cpan.org
From: "David E. Wheeler" <dwheeler [...] cpan.org>
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:21 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: Show quoted text
>> I *think* that URI.pm gets it right, if I’m reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encodingcorrectly.
> > Er, no, maybe URI::Escape gets it right? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 lists @ as reserved. So I guess URI.pm does not get it right. > > This shit really should not be so confusing! ;-P
D’oh, never mind, it’s because path components can be less strict about what needs to be encoded. Sorry for the noise, please close this ticket. David
  Sun Mar 11 10:27:51 2012 GAAS [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'new' to 'rejected'