Seems to me that we should either just drop DBIC::Test for such a simple component, or have the DBIC::Test author make sure the reps are correct. Or am I missing the point?
John
>________________________________
>From: Phillip Moore via RT <bug-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp@rt.cpan.org>
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:47 AM
>Subject: [rt.cpan.org #72443] build_requires also needs DBD::SQLite
>
>Tue Nov 15 11:47:56 2011: Request 72443 was acted upon.
>Transaction: Ticket created by WPMOORE
> Queue: DBIx-Class-TimeStamp
> Subject: build_requires also needs DBD::SQLite
> Broken in: 0.14
> Severity: Important
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: w.phillip.moore@gmail.com
> Status: new
>Ticket <URL:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=72443 >
>
>
>Can you please add DBD::SQLite to the build_requires list? Since DBIC::Test bails out when it
>can't use this module, it's pretty clear that it should be listed as a dependency.
>
>Also, the behavior of t/04basic.t seems odd -- this one test checks for DBD::SQLite, and the
>skips that test if not found, but the next one bails out and fails, since DBIC::Test requires it.
>
>
>