On Sun Jul 01 18:01:56 2012, MITHALDU wrote:
Show quoted text> Oh, huh. I never looked at the internals. However I'd still say this
> report has merit, just so strftime has compatibility to the C strftime
> implementations. Looking at DateTime.pm that seems rather trivial to
> patch in too. Should i just make a patch and open a ticket on
DateTime?
My strftime (Ubuntu 12.04) has no %L, so I don't know how standard this
is.
The problem with patching DateTime is that I really want DateTime and
DT-F-Strptime to be in sync, which means also patching DT-F-Strptime at
the same time.
Also, I'm just not that keen on adding more strftime stuff. It's a
pretty limiting format. CLDR is the way forward. It has a lot more
flexibility.