Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the lexicals CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 71174
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: lexicals

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: NEILB [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 0.21



Subject: Shouldn't this be Lexicals not lexicals?
Shouldn't this be: use Lexicals; rather than use lexicals; since it's not a pragma, it's a module which exports a function.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #71174] Shouldn't this be Lexicals not lexicals?
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:03:11 +0200
To: bug-lexicals [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Ingy dot Net <ingy [...] ingy.net>
Possibly. I think I called it that because it adds a keyword (as it were) that one might expect in Perl (if they were from Python). Kinda like the boolean.pm module. On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Neil_Bowers via RT < bug-lexicals@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> Thu Sep 22 18:06:58 2011: Request 71174 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by NEILB > Queue: lexicals > Subject: Shouldn't this be Lexicals not lexicals? > Broken in: (no value) > Severity: Normal > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: NEILB@cpan.org > Status: new > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=71174 > > > > Shouldn't this be: > > use Lexicals; > > rather than > > use lexicals; > > since it's not a pragma, it's a module which exports a function. >