Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the Dist-Zilla-Plugin-TaskWeaver CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 69189
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Dist-Zilla-Plugin-TaskWeaver

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: RUSSOZ [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: 0.101621
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Error when using 'reason' in the last =pkg listed in the POD
 Run 'dzil test' in the test case directory attached (or available at the git repo:  https://github.com/russoz/test-case-taskweaver )

If the last =pkg is in the form

=pkg Some::Module 1.234

everything goes smoothly. But if it is in the form:

=pkg Some::Module 1.234 some reason here

it blows with the message:

Can't locate object method "children" via package "Pod::Elemental::Element::Pod5::Command" at /home/az/perl5/lib/perl5/Pod/Weaver/Plugin/TaskWeaver.pm line 76.
 
Subject: My-Module.tar.gz
Download My-Module.tar.gz
application/x-gzip 613b

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.

Friendly reminder. :-o)

On Wed Jun 29 14:43:28 2011, RUSSOZ wrote:
Show quoted text
> Run 'dzil test' in the test case directory attached (or available at
> the git
> repo: https://github.com/russoz/test-case-taskweaver )
>
> If the last =pkg is in the form
>
> =pkg Some::Module 1.234
>
> everything goes smoothly. But if it is in the form:
>
> =pkg Some::Module 1.234 some reason here
>
> it blows with the message:
>
> Can't locate object method "children" via package
> "Pod::Elemental::Element::Pod5::Command" at
> /home/az/perl5/lib/perl5/Pod/Weaver/Plugin/TaskWeaver.pm line 76.


 Still occurring in 0.101624
Thanks for prodding me about this. It had just slipped through the cracks a few times. The bug turned out to be a bit tricky for me to track down, but I managed it. It isn't in TaskWeaver, but in Pod::Elemental. If you upgrade, you'll see this fixed. The code now contains a comment explaining the bug. Basically: stupid off-by-one error because I was being clever. -- rjbs
Ha :-) It happens to all of us.

I just verified that it passed that test case I wrote (for dzil, actually).

Thanks for your prompt action!

Cheers,
Russo