Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the DBD-SQLite CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 68163
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: DBD-SQLite

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: hinrik.sig [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Wishlist
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Support for the asynchronous I/O module
http://sqlite.org/asyncvfs.html It would be useful to have a DBH method which registers the async IO module and creates the background thread for it, for applications where speed is more important than durability.
It would also be useful to have a wrapper around the sqlite3async_control() function (described in sqlite3async.h), to be able to e.g. disable file locking for increased throughput in single-DB-connection applications.
On Fri May 13 10:57:07 2011, HINRIK wrote: Show quoted text
> It would also be useful to have a wrapper around the > sqlite3async_control() function (described in sqlite3async.h), to be > able to e.g. disable file locking for increased throughput in > single-DB-connection applications.
Sorry for the late reply. I just noticed the note on http://sqlite.org/asyncvfs.html that says "The use of WAL mode largely obviates the need for this asynchronous I/O module. Hence, this module is no longer supported." Marked as stalled.
On Fri Oct 03 14:29:40 2014, ISHIGAKI wrote: Show quoted text
> On Fri May 13 10:57:07 2011, HINRIK wrote:
> > It would also be useful to have a wrapper around the > > sqlite3async_control() function (described in sqlite3async.h), to be > > able to e.g. disable file locking for increased throughput in > > single-DB-connection applications.
> > Sorry for the late reply. > > I just noticed the note on http://sqlite.org/asyncvfs.html that says > "The use of WAL mode largely obviates the need for this asynchronous > I/O module. Hence, this module is no longer supported." > > Marked as stalled.
Marked as rejected. Thanks.