Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the ZeroMQ CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 66020
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: ZeroMQ
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: DARCH [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Unimportant
Broken in: 0.09
Fixed in: (no value)
Attachments
ZeroMQ-build-with-zmq-2.0.10.log

History Show all quoted text
  Mon Feb 21 23:44:00 2011 DARCH [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: Build failure against libzmq 2.0.10
ZeroMQ fails to build against zmq 2.0.10 with the attached errors. It builds fine against 2.1.0.
Subject: ZeroMQ-build-with-zmq-2.0.10.log
Download ZeroMQ-build-with-zmq-2.0.10.log
application/octet-stream 1.4k

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.

  Tue Feb 22 00:47:25 2011 dmaki [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
I do not recommend 2.0.10 for any binding, as it has a problem where it blocks even when receiving proper signals like sigint. So I'm reluctant to spend the time to make it work on any version under 2.1.0 if you'd like to send me patch, however, I'll happily apply it.
  Tue Feb 22 00:47:25 2011 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Tue Feb 22 13:23:25 2011 DARCH [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue Feb 22 00:47:25 2011, DMAKI wrote: Show quoted text
> I do not recommend 2.0.10 for any binding, as it has a problem where > it blocks even when > receiving proper signals like sigint. So I'm reluctant to spend the > time to make it work on any > version under 2.1.0 > > if you'd like to send me patch, however, I'll happily apply it.
I don't have a patch for this, because I kind of feel the same way. In fact, I feel more strongly about it still -- I think ZeroMQ should drop 2.0 support entirely and allow socket cloning. This bug is only a bug if ZeroMQ claims to support 2.0; I'm going to downgrade its Severity by way of a hint. :D
  Tue Feb 22 13:23:54 2011 DARCH [...] cpan.org - Severity Normal changed to Unimportant
  Thu Jan 19 12:35:35 2012 dolmen [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Le 2011-02-22 06:47:25, DMAKI a écrit : Show quoted text
> I do not recommend 2.0.10 for any binding, as it has a problem where > it blocks even when > receiving proper signals like sigint. So I'm reluctant to spend the > time to make it work on any > version under 2.1.0
It would be helpful to put a clear message: - in the Makefile.PL (fail early) - in the POD Note that Ubuntu 11.04 (this is not that old) has this 2.0.10 version. -- Olivier Mengué - http://perlresume.org/DOLMEN