Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Module-ScanDeps CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 65855
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Module-ScanDeps
People
Owner: RSCHUPP [...] cpan.org
Requestors: czbsd [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in:
  • 0.90
  • 0.91
  • 0.92
  • 0.93
  • 0.94
  • 0.95
  • 0.96
  • 0.97
  • 0.98
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Thu Feb 17 16:59:43 2011 czbsd [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: Special handling for POSIX requested
I'd like to vote that the patch from this posting be adopted: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.par/2009/06/msg4084.html This is a tiny tweak that helps when using the POSIX with PAR. Thank you, Charles Owens
  Fri Feb 18 03:20:25 2011 RSCHUPP [...] cpan.org - Taken
  Fri Feb 18 03:20:30 2011 RSCHUPP [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Fri Feb 18 03:26:45 2011 RSCHUPP [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On 2011-02-17 16:59:43, CZBSD wrote: Show quoted text
> I'd like to vote that the patch from this posting be adopted: > > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.par/2009/06/msg4084.html > > > This is a tiny tweak that helps when using the POSIX with PAR.
Sorry, that patch apparently fell through the cracks. But I don't like the proposed patch anymore. What is your actual problem? Still the POSIX::SigAction problem? Cheers, Roderich
  Fri Feb 18 08:51:31 2011 cowens [...] erudyn.com - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #65855] Special handling for POSIX requested
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:51:19 -0500
To: bug-Module-ScanDeps [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Charles Owens <cowens [...] erudyn.com>
On 2/18/11 3:26 AM, Roderich Schupp via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=65855> > > On 2011-02-17 16:59:43, CZBSD wrote:
>> I'd like to vote that the patch from this posting be adopted: >> >> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.par/2009/06/msg4084.html >> >> >> This is a tiny tweak that helps when using the POSIX with PAR.
> Sorry, that patch apparently fell through the cracks. > But I don't like the proposed patch anymore. > > What is your actual problem? Still the POSIX::SigAction problem? > > Cheers, Roderich
Yes, precisely. Currently I have to manually apply the patch whenever setting up a new development system. Do you have a different approach in mind? Thank you, Charles -- ==== Charles Owens === charles.owens@erudyn.com ====
  Sat Feb 19 11:03:40 2011 RSCHUPP [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
I've commited a slightly different solution and released Module::ScanDeps 1.00 (finally out of 0.xx!) Cheers, Roderich
  Sat Feb 19 11:03:41 2011 RSCHUPP [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'