Bug #6555 for Params-Validate: taint test installs on FreeBSD 5.x

Tue Jun 08 14:34:39 2004 Guest - Ticket created

Subject:

taint test installs on FreeBSD 5.x

See: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/140179 There are other test results showing that FreeBSD 4.x doesn't have a problem. (Of course, the issue doesn't have to lie between the diffence between 4.x and 5.x, but it seems like a reasonable first place to look). Anyone else have another 5.x machine to test on? Mark

Tue Jun 08 14:51:01 2004 Guest - Correspondence added

From:

markstos [...] cpan.org

Here are the failure details: not ok 65 0 parameters were passed to main::sub17a but 1 - 4 were expected main::sub17a() called at t/tests.pl line 274 eval {...} called at t/tests.pl line 274 main::run_tests() called at t/01-validate.t line 169 require 01-validate.t called at t/13-taint.t line 9 did not match: ^0 parameters were passed .* but 3 - 4 were expected ok 66 not ok 67 0 parameters were passed to main::sub17b but 1 - 4 were expected main::sub17b() called at t/tests.pl line 278 eval {...} called at t/tests.pl line 278 main::run_tests() called at t/01-validate.t line 169 require 01-validate.t called at t/13-taint.t line 9 did not match: ^0 parameters were passed .* but 3 - 4 were expected

Thu Sep 09 10:09:36 2004 DROLSKY [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

[guest - Tue Jun 8 14:34:39 2004]: Show quoted text

> See: > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/140179 > > There are other test results showing that FreeBSD 4.x doesn't have a > problem. > > (Of course, the issue doesn't have to lie between the diffence between > 4.x and 5.x, but it seems like a reasonable first place to look). > Anyone else have another 5.x machine to test on?

The difference may be the difference in Perl versions. What version did you get this failure with?

Wed Sep 22 15:12:59 2004 DROLSKY [...] cpan.org - Given to DROLSKY

Thu Feb 23 01:11:40 2006 DROLSKY [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'new' to 'resolved'