Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the List-AllUtils CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 65120
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: List-AllUtils

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: dagolden [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Wishlist
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 0.11



Subject: please include List::UtilsBy
More nice sugar. Sadly, no XS, though.
The docs for UtilsBy say this in the TODO - "Merge into List::Util or List::MoreUtils" Apparently the author tried to do so in the past with no luck. Maybe now that Adam Kennedy is maintaining MoreUtils he could try again. It seems rather ridiculous that even Utils & MoreUtils both exist, thus necessitating AllUtils.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #65120] please include List::UtilsBy
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:11:33 -0500
To: bug-List-AllUtils [...] rt.cpan.org
From: David Golden <dagolden [...] cpan.org>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dave Rolsky via RT <bug-List-AllUtils@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> Apparently the author tried to do so in the past with no luck. Maybe now > that Adam Kennedy is maintaining MoreUtils he could try again. > > It seems rather ridiculous that even Utils & MoreUtils both exist, thus > necessitating AllUtils.
Well, Utils is core, so I can see a general "less core bloat" argument, but I agree with you 100% -- David
On 2011-01-25 12:12:02, DAGOLDEN wrote: Show quoted text
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dave Rolsky via RT > <bug-List-AllUtils@rt.cpan.org> wrote:
> > Apparently the author tried to do so in the past with no luck. Maybe now > > that Adam Kennedy is maintaining MoreUtils he could try again. > > > > It seems rather ridiculous that even Utils & MoreUtils both exist, thus > > necessitating AllUtils.
> > Well, Utils is core, so I can see a general "less core bloat" > argument, but I agree with you 100% > > -- David
done in the 0.11 release.