Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Oxford-Calendar CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 64539
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Oxford-Calendar

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: socks-bitcard.org [...] earth.li
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Important
Broken in: 2.04
Fixed in: 2.05



Subject: 11th Week Hilary repeated
ToOx() is repeating some weeks. Examples: Both 28/03/2010 and 04/04/2010 come back as "Sunday, 11th Week, Hilary 2010" Similarly 25/03/2012 and 01/04/2012 come back as "Sunday, 11th Week, Hilary 2012" These are the only two examples I can see, going back a year, and forward two years.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #64539] 11th Week Hilary repeated
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:58:04 +0000
To: Stephen Gower via RT <bug-Oxford-Calendar [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Dominic Hargreaves <dom [...] earth.li>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:59:30AM -0500, Stephen Gower via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> ToOx() is repeating some weeks. > > Examples: > Both 28/03/2010 and 04/04/2010 come back as "Sunday, 11th Week, Hilary > 2010" > Similarly 25/03/2012 and 01/04/2012 come back as "Sunday, 11th Week, > Hilary 2012" > > These are the only two examples I can see, going back a year, and > forward two years.
Thanks for the report. I've confirmed the problem, but unfortunately haven't yet had a chance to dig into the code to try and figure this one out. Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
On Sun Jan 23 06:58:16 2011, dom@earth.li wrote: Show quoted text
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:59:30AM -0500, Stephen Gower via RT wrote:
> > ToOx() is repeating some weeks. > > > > Examples: > > Both 28/03/2010 and 04/04/2010 come back as "Sunday, 11th Week, Hilary > > 2010" > > Similarly 25/03/2012 and 01/04/2012 come back as "Sunday, 11th Week, > > Hilary 2012" > > > > These are the only two examples I can see, going back a year, and > > forward two years.
> > Thanks for the report. I've confirmed the problem, but unfortunately > haven't yet had a chance to dig into the code to try and figure this > one out.
Fixed in 2.05.