Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the Storable CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 638
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Storable
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: schwern [...] pobox.com
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Wed May 22 15:01:21 2002 schwern [...] pobox.com - Ticket created
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:01:14 -0400
From: Michael G Schwern <schwern [...] pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Storable 2.0.0 fails on vendor perl on Mac OS X 10.1
To: Nicholas Clark <nick [...] ccl4.org>
Cc: Jesse <jesse [...] fsck.com>, perl5-porters [...] perl.org, bug-storable [...] rt.cpan.org
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:12:12PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: Show quoted text
> > The old Storable worked great. Storable 2.0.0 fails tests consistently > > like this:
>
> > t/downgrade.....NOK 34# Failed test (t/downgrade.t at line 99) > > # got: '??' > > # expected: '? > > t/downgrade.....NOK 37# Failed test (t/downgrade.t at line 99)
> > Thanks for the report. I get these failures on every system I've built > Storable with 5.6.0 on, and documented them in the ChangeLog. > Probably I should have done it in the README, or even as a warning in the > Makefile.PL. > > To the best of my knowledge Storable 2.00 works just as well on 5.6.0 as > 1.0.14. The test is failing because of bug in eq in perl 5.6.0:
My results on 5.6.0 (Linux/PowerPC) are quite a bit noisier and are definately trying to compare different characters: t/downgrade.........NOK 34# Failed test (t/downgrade.t at line 99) # got: 'ß' # expected: 'ß' t/downgrade.........NOK 37# Failed test (t/downgrade.t at line 99) # got: 'ßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßß' # expected: 'ßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßß' t/downgrade.........ok 59/59# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 59. Looks like ASCII 223 and 195 + ... I'm not quite sure what the second character is. -- This sig file temporarily out of order.
  Thu May 30 08:22:52 2002 ams [...] wiw.org - Status changed from 'new' to 'resolved'
  Thu May 30 08:22:52 2002 ams [...] wiw.org - Correspondence added
Fixed in 2.02