Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the App-Stash CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 63179
Status: resolved
Worked: 30 min
Priority: 0/
Queue: App-Stash

People
Owner: jozef [...] kutej.net
Requestors: ANDK [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: 0.01
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Undeclared dependency on Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast
As per subject. Result of a grep for "Chained": http://search.cpan.org/grep?cpanid=JKUTEJ&release=App-Stash-0.01&string=Chained&F=1&n=1&C=3 Example fail report: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/3f92cee6-ec05-11df-b77e-ffdfa1cc6b1c I was wondering that so few fail reports exist. Maybe it's because most skip this test because they have Test::Distribution not installed. But there must be other reasons too that I don't know yet. In any case it would seem to be the right thing to declare Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast as a prerequisite. Or am I missing something? Thanks && Regards,
Yes you are right. I've added Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast to the Build.PL and uploaded version 0.02 to pause. Thank you for reporting! Jozef On Sat Nov 20 00:24:54 2010, ANDK wrote: Show quoted text
> As per subject. > > Result of a grep for "Chained": > > http://search.cpan.org/grep?cpanid=JKUTEJ&release=App-Stash- > 0.01&string=Chained&F=1&n=1&C=3 > > Example fail report: > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/3f92cee6-ec05-11df-b77e- > ffdfa1cc6b1c > > I was wondering that so few fail reports exist. Maybe it's because > most > skip this test because they have Test::Distribution not installed. But > there must be other reasons too that I don't know yet. > > In any case it would seem to be the right thing to declare > Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast as a prerequisite. Or am I missing > something? > > Thanks && Regards,