Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the Test-Wrapper CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 62772
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Test-Wrapper

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: ANDK [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: 0.2.0
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Signature broken
As per subject: % cpansign -v [CPANSHELL] Executing gpg --verify --batch --no-tty --keyserver=hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371 --keyserver-options=auto-key-retrieve SIGNATURE gpg: Signature made Sun 24 Oct 2010 07:53:14 PM CEST using DSA key ID E1B00B8C gpg: Good signature from "Yanick Champoux <yanick@babyl.dyndns.org>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: B844 CAF6 2D99 7203 F225 6C71 DF81 F07F E1B0 0B8C Not in MANIFEST: README ==> MISMATCHED content between MANIFEST and distribution files! <== HTH, Regards,
This is weird. The signature complains that the README is absent, but it's there. I also perused other test reports, and lots of smokers that also have Module::Signature installed report success. So... I am a little bit at loss about what went wrong here. I'll tentatively close the ticket as it doesn't seem to be reproducible elsewhere. But, by all means, if it happens to you again, please poke me.
Yes, this is weird. I'm sorry, I cannot reproduce either and do not remember any details. I suppose rejecting is the right thing to do. If RT now changes the status to open, I'll put back to rejected. Cheers,
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #62772] Signature broken
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:51:52 -0400
To: bug-Test-Wrapper [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Yanick Champoux <yanick.champoux [...] gmail.com>
On 12-08-09 02:46 AM, Andreas Koenig via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> I suppose rejecting is the right thing to do.
I kinda wish that there was a "cannot reproduce" option, 'cause "Rejected" does sound awfully harsh. But I'll keep my eyes open for other reports, and potential root cause for that odd behavior. And, in any cases, many thanks for the report in the first place. :-) Joy, `/anick