Bug #60954 for NetPacket: Updated license to Artistic 2.0

Wed Sep 01 16:47:44 2010 REHSACK [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

Updated license to Artistic 2.0

Hi, you write that you have updated the license to artistic-2.0, but you have neither a COPYING document in your distribution nor your source documentation modified (they say: "you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself" - and this means: artistic-v1 or gpl-v2+) nor updated you META.yml (license => "artistic_2" in your Build.PL). Would be great if you can do that. Best regards, Jens

Wed Sep 01 21:37:07 2010 yanick [...] babyl.dyndns.org - Correspondence added

Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #60954] Updated license to Artistic 2.0
Date:	Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:37:09 -0400
To:	bug-NetPacket [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Yanick Champoux <yanick [...] babyl.dyndns.org>

On 09/01/2010 04:47 PM, Jens Rehsack via RT wrote: Show quoted text

> you write that you have updated the license to artistic-2.0, but you > have neither a COPYING document in your distribution

No, I have a LICENSE document: http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/YANICK/NetPacket-0.43.1/LICENSE Show quoted text

> nor your source > documentation modified (they say: "you can redistribute it and/or modify > it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system > itself" - and this means: artistic-v1 or gpl-v2+)

True. I'll fix that. Show quoted text

> nor updated you > META.yml (license => "artistic_2" in your Build.PL).

Are you sure you are looking at the most recent version? They are there for me: http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/YANICK/NetPacket-0.43.1/META.yml http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/YANICK/NetPacket-0.43.1/Build.PL `/.

Wed Sep 01 21:37:08 2010 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Thu Sep 02 01:48:52 2010 REHSACK [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On Wed Sep 01 21:37:07 2010, yanick@babyl.dyndns.org wrote: Show quoted text

> On 09/01/2010 04:47 PM, Jens Rehsack via RT wrote:

> > you write that you have updated the license to artistic-2.0, but you > > have neither a COPYING document in your distribution

> > No, I have a LICENSE document: > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/YANICK/NetPacket-0.43.1/LICENSE

Overseen, sorry Show quoted text

> > nor your source

> > documentation modified (they say: "you can redistribute it and/or modify > > it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system > > itself" - and this means: artistic-v1 or gpl-v2+)

> > True. I'll fix that. > >

> > nor updated you > > META.yml (license => "artistic_2" in your Build.PL).

> > Are you sure you are looking at the most recent version? They are there > for me: > > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/YANICK/NetPacket-0.43.1/META.yml > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/YANICK/NetPacket-0.43.1/Build.PL

Yes, there is a license "artistic2" named, which is not a valid identifier. I agree, that M:B should warn about that (probably it's worth to bug xdg when tried the latest version). /Jens

Mon Oct 11 21:27:53 2010 yanick+cpan [...] babyl.dyndns.org - Correspondence added

Show quoted text

> > > nor your source

> > > documentation modified (they say: "you can redistribute it and/or

modify Show quoted text

> > > it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system > > > itself" - and this means: artistic-v1 or gpl-v2+)

> > > > True. I'll fix that.

Should be fixed as of release v0.43.2 Show quoted text

> Yes, there is a license "artistic2" named, which is not a valid > identifier. I agree, that M:B should warn about that (probably it's > worth to bug xdg when tried the latest version).

Dist::Zilla now output artistic_2, which should do the trick.

Mon Oct 11 21:28:31 2010 yanick+cpan [...] babyl.dyndns.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Bug #60954 for NetPacket: Updated license to Artistic 2.0

Preferred bug tracker