Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the App-SD CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 60084
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: App-SD

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: olivier.berger [...] it-sudparis.eu
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Wishlist
Broken in: 0.74
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Implement OSLC-CM consumer to sync to any compliant tracker
OSLC-CM [0] is a proposed standard for interfaces with bugtrackers. It would be great if SD could operate to sync with OSLC-CM compatible trackers. Note that among such trackers will be Mantis once [1] is completed, and FusionForge trackers [2], to only mention open source trackers for which I know OSLC-CM implementations plans are currently ongoing. Best regards, [0] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmHome [1] http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=11063 [2] https://fusionforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=62&group_id=6&atid=114
Could you tell me where the related code is in mantisbt? I got its official git repository and didn't find that. On Wed Aug 04 16:09:08 2010, http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ wrote: Show quoted text
> OSLC-CM [0] is a proposed standard for interfaces with bugtrackers. > > It would be great if SD could operate to sync with OSLC-CM compatible > trackers. > > Note that among such trackers will be Mantis once [1] is completed, and > FusionForge trackers [2], to only mention open source trackers for which > I know OSLC-CM implementations plans are currently ongoing. > > Best regards, > > [0] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmHome > [1] http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=11063 > [2] https://fusionforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=62&group_id=6&atid=114
From: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger [...] it-sudparis.eu>
On Mon Aug 09 21:15:40 2010, SUNNAVY wrote: Show quoted text
> Could you tell me where the related code is in mantisbt? > I got its official git repository and didn't find that. >
It's not yet in the standard codebase, and is being developped in our SVN repo. But the plan is to try and have it adopted by MantisBT. We want to bring it closer to 1.0 (0.7 at the moment), i.e. to complying with most important features of OSLC-CM V1 before contributing it officially to MantisBT. More details at : https://picoforge.int-evry.fr/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Oslc/Web/MantisOslcServer Note that we're currently refactoring the Zend framework code to merge the two implementations for Mantis and FusionForge.
From: olivier.berger [...] it-sudparis.eu
On Wed Aug 04 16:09:08 2010, http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ wrote: Show quoted text
> OSLC-CM [0] is a proposed standard for interfaces with bugtrackers. > > It would be great if SD could operate to sync with OSLC-CM compatible > trackers. > > Note that among such trackers will be Mantis once [1] is completed, and > FusionForge trackers [2], to only mention open source trackers for which > I know OSLC-CM implementations plans are currently ongoing. >
More details on OSLC-CM compatible trackers : the FusionForge one is more mature now that the MantisBT's, and there exist a wrapper for Bugzilla (Cf. Eclipse Lyo project), that can be used too. My 2 cents,