On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 05:09:33AM -0400, Mark Lawrence via RT wrote:
Show quoted text>
> commit 313e045026d6a6a0b354da1f61732c1c5f016e68
> Author: Philippe Bruhat (BooK) <book@cpan.org>
> Date: Thu Jul 1 12:24:15 2010 +0200
>
> Document git init behaviour changed in 1.6.5
>
> RT #58874 by Mark Lawrence
>
> Wouldn't it be nice if a git commit would scan the commit message, and
> react based on the contents? For example if "fixed: RT#58874" was found
> then post the commit message back to the bug report, or even change the
> bug status.
>
> Know of anything like that? Would you find it useful if I hacked
> something up?
>
I don't know of anything like that. It could be useful, but I guess
everyone has their own way of documenting this (e.g. in the Changes
file). Also, this would probably be done has a commit-hook.
I would probably not use it, because I tend to commit more than what
actually ends up on the public repo, and I wouldn't want to leak those
meaningless changes to the bugtracker. I usually update the tickets
from time to time, typically after a release appears in RT.
--
Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
None suffer so much in a war as those who strive to end it.
(Moral from Groo The Wanderer #51 (Epic))