On Sun Aug 01 17:56:13 2010, DOLMEN wrote:
Show quoted text> Le Lun 26 Jui 2010 23:09:21, RCAPUTO a écrit :
> > It appears that the methods work as documented. The methods return
> > undef, and $! is set to ESRCH when these methods fail.
>
> This is not the subject of this bug. Could you have a look at the
whole history?
I read the entire ticket.
Show quoted text> The documentation says nothing about giving an alias name as the first
argument of refcount_ methods.
Yes. The documentation is correct. The methods don't accept aliases.
Show quoted text> And I suggest that an alias should be accepted and resolved for
consistency as alias are usually accepted where session ID are accepted.
The consistency isn't worth the additional overhead this would incur for
all users, most of whom don't need it. You can look up the session ID
yourself, adding overhead for your specific use case without penalizing
everyone else for your convenience.